2 Mar
2018
2 Mar
'18
6:53 a.m.
On Mar 1, 2018, at 6:30 PM, Harald Koch <chk@pobox.com> wrote:
On 1 March 2018 at 18:48, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
ULA provide stable internal addresses which survive changing ISP for the average home user.
Yeah this is pretty much what I'm doing. ULA for stable, internal addresses that I can put into the (internal) DNS: ISP prefixes for global routing. Renumbering is hard.
All of the objections I've seen to ULA are actually objections to (IPv6) NAT, which is why I was confused.
I object to NAT more strongly than ULA, but IMHO, even if you aren’t going to route it, a block of GUA PI makes more sense than ULA for virtually any installation I can imagine. Owen