29 Mar
2022
29 Mar
'22
5:09 p.m.
On Mar 26, 2022, at 17:30 , Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
It still looks like NAT to me.
Almost all the people, perhaps other than you, accept NAT as is to keep IPv4 Internet or as part of transition plan from IPv4 to IPv6.
NAT is a disgusting hack and destroys the universal peer to peer nature of the internet in favor of a consumer/provider model.
As I repeatedly pointed out, end to end NAT is clean preserving the universal peer to peer nature of the Internet.
Nope… It really isn’t. The problem of audit trail opacity is still a major issue with any form of stateful NAT. Owen