SEE!?!

With no evidence yet publicly acknowledged as to who added the AOC email to the list now they are just accusing some random "A woman!"

Words (The Pen) are mightier than any brute force (The Sword).

And you did it without thought, just piled on. It came as natural to you as putting on your shoes in the morning.

JeffP

jeffp@jeffp.us

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

NOTICE:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Use or dissemination by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail to correct our records. Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entirety, including any backup processes that your system may perform. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender, therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lorell Hathcock <lorell@hathcock.org>
Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is the policy about sharing email offlist?
To: Javier J <javier@advancedmachines.us>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>

A-woman!

Sincerely,

Lorell Hathcock

On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J <javier@advancedmachines.us> wrote:



I agree 100%.

I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list because of someone's behavior.

- Javier

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:

There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain
what caused them to do that and have undone it.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:

> The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
>
> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
>
> On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>>  Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is the
>>  policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing
>>  offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that someone.
>>  Anne
>>
>>  --
>>  Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
>>  Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
>>  Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
>>  Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
>>  Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
>>  Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
>>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________