11 Apr
2006
11 Apr
'06
1:52 p.m.
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:04:39 EDT, Alain Hebert said:
Paul Vixie wrote:
that creates new liability, and isn't realistic in today's litigious world. It is DIX resources/equipements... they are not oblige to offer reliable/secure/valide/etc services to anybody outside their clients.
It like saying that blacklist services like spamcop should be liable for mail servers XYZ deleting your email.
Paul is speaking from experience, having dealt with altogether too many people who *do* believe that services Spamcop should be liable... Even if it isn't a *legal* liability where you're forced to pay out damages, having to carry '$100,000 legal fees' on the balance sheet is an accounting liability, not an asset....