On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:40:28AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 9:33 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Funny!
On one hand people talk about ARIN providing IP allocation at nearly zero cost and on the other hand talking that ARIN goes after companies that use their allocation for abuse (which has a non trivial cost and potential expensive lawsuits)...
Do you know what you want?
Let's clarify the definition of abuse in this context. We are not talking about people who use their IPs to abuse the network. We are talking about resource recipients who use their allocations or assignments in contravention to the policies under which they received them (and thus contrary to the RSA which they signed when they received them).
Owen
In the formal ARIN context, there is a distiction between abuse and fraud. abuse:: https://www.arin.net/abuse.html fraud:: https://www.arin.net/resources/fraud/index.html It would be helpful in clarifing the discussion if folks used the proper terminology. --bill