On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, Vince Fuller wrote:
What we are seeing, though, is "R A M" at Point1 and nothing at Point2, likely because Randy doesn't consider "R B M", received from one of his peers, to be a customer route.
Ahh, now that's another story. That is something it is reasonable for a peer to object to. If you are going to advertise a route to a block at one peering point, you should be advertising a route to that block at all peering points and with the same AS length. It is not consistent policy to route to a customer through both another customer and a non-customer. That's what you can't do. Alternatively, if you do decide you must accept routes to a customer from a non-customer, you must consider those routes to be customer routes. Agree? Disagree? DS