I doubt it. If they use the BAM stuff and launch in October (after World Series) the timing might be right. 

Sent from my iCar

On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:06 PM, Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:

Agreed, I noticed the single IX as well and asked them about it in my email. If they don't expand aggressively in the next ~6 months, they're going to have a very problematic launch.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Ross Tajvar wrote:

> Yeah, I'm going to send them an email and see if I can get ahold of their peering policy.
> I'm hoping they will update it as they get more attention from other networks. They may just be procrastinating
> setting things up. According to bgp.he.net they are only announcing one v4 /24 and one v6 /48, which could be
> enough IPs, but seems a little on the small side.

I'd be much more worried about only being on one IX than only advertising
a single /24 and /48.  I'm guessing they've just not fully fleshed out the
peeringdb entry and maybe not fully built out the network infrastructure
yet.  A CDN, with everything coming from one POP in NY is not going to cut
it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
                              |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________