+1 for Dokuwiki as well as Gitlab. 

I personally like Gitlab but fact that wiki is on per project basis. It is easy to use Dokuwiki as a general purpose, project independent wiki. 



On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 9:20 PM Ray Orsini <ray@oit.co> wrote:

Confluence is good for small teams. Self-hosted is $10r. Plus addons we end up around $150/yr. Unfortunately, we outgrew it in terms of users. Additional users are way too expensive.

 

OIT Website

Ray Orsini

Chief Executive Officer

OIT, LLC

 305.967.6756 x1009

 | 

 305.571.6272

 ray@oit.co

 | 

 www.oit.co

 oit.co/ray

Facebook

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

How are we doing? We'd love to hear your feedback. https://go.oit.co/review

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Craig
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas@gmail.com>; nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: WIKI documentation Software?

 

 

Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,

 

We’ve managed to avoid using that. 

 

 

 

 

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas@gmail.com> wrote:

Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint. 

 

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <cvuljanic@gmail.com> wrote:

Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to / how to's for staff, etc. 

 

pro's

con's

 

We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.

 

thanks;

 

CPV

 

 



--


Anurag Bhatia