Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

Le Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 05:08:43PM -0800, William Herrin a écrit :

I don't recall there being any equipment or software compatibility concerns with 1.0.0.0/8. If you do, feel free to refresh my memory.

Perhaps not the whole /8 but definitely some buggy implementations : https://seclists.org/nanog/2018/Apr/52