19 Apr
2010
19 Apr
'10
10:24 a.m.
On 4/19/10 9:14 AM, "Patrick Giagnocavo" <patrick@zill.net> wrote:
The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers, not operational considerations.
Personally, I'm just waiting to see which eyeball ISP is the first to react to looming IPv4 exhaustion by (NAT | IPv6 && 6to4)ing their client ranges and using the freed up /9 to offer colo/hosting services at very competitive (compared to desperately scrambling to find a /29 at your IPv4-exhausted ISP) pricing. -- Dave Pooser, ACSA Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com