9 Apr
2015
9 Apr
'15
8:59 p.m.
Fairly certain thats a typo and supposed to be 960M pps :) On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
the math on their page is 'interesting'...
1.28tbps throughput (which is .08 or so tbps better than 64 10g ports equivalent) 960mbps forwarding
err... so for just plain switching line-rate 64 10gbps ports. For forwarding traffic (being a router) ~1gbps.
ouch, don't route.
-- eSited LLC (701) 390-9638