At 02:47 PM 12-11-04 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
AS18566 751 6 745 99.2% CVAD Covad Communications AS4134 825 178 647 78.4% CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street AS4323 794 223 571 71.9% TWTC Time Warner Telecom AS6197 814 430 384 47.2% BNS-14 BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS22773 401 17 384 95.8% CXA Cox Communications Inc. AS27364 413 45 368 89.1% ARMC Armstrong Cable Services AS701 1230 884 346 28.1% UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS22909 412 81 331 80.3% CMCS Comcast Cable Communications, Inc.
are these numbers what i think, but hope not, they are?
e.g. is AS18566 the origin AS for 751 prefixes that could be collapsed to 6?
Barry and me tried: http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html Covad was first contacted Aug 2002:
ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS18566 264 4 260 98.5% COVAD Covad Communications
But Covad was just one. I used to quietly contact these "pollutors" along with a few others who helped out (Barry and Terry) but as of a year ago I'm giving my 5-10 hours of volunteerism per month to nsp-sec. -Hank
if not, then perhaps the report could use some work.
if so, then o why are providers indulging is such extremely sick behavior o and who can hack the perl to generate filters for this so we can listen only to the aggregates
randy