9 Sep
2002
9 Sep
'02
7:44 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:04:36PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: [snip]
60.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa. CNAME bla-reverse.example.org. bla-reverse.example.org. PTR bla.example.org. bla.example.org. A 10.0.1.60
What's wrong with that? No RFC against it ;)
Are you sure about that? IIRC, the definitions of CNAME records and what they can point to are pretty strict.
If that is illegal, then so is RFC2317 :)
Cool, why does it work then? <grin>
Just because something hasn't actually been made officially illegal doesn't mean that it's not a really bad idea.
It seems to me RFC2317 is pushing the edge of standards more than my solution is. Greetz, Peter -- peter@dataloss.nl | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue