In message <9FF40D24-169E-4568-9F25-EE00BEEED13A@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes:
Well, for starters there's whole truckloads of surplus gear that you can't get for pennies and use successfully.
Surplus IPv6 capable gear has been around for a long while now. Remember most gear has had IPv6 for over a decade now. A lot of gear that ISC got given for IPv6 development was on it 2nd or 3rd repurposing before we got it nearly a decade ago.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:34:41 -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams said:
#insert usual junk from *nog v6 evangelicals that .africa and .eos (Basque Autonomous Region) must drive v6 adoption from their ever-so-deep-pockets, or the net will die.
I'll bite. What's the *actual* additional cost for dnssec and ipv6 support for a greenfield rollout? It's greenfield, so there's no "our older gear/software/admins need upgrading" issues.
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org