On May 29, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
Basically, while you presented the "pro" side of unencrypted content (being able to cache), you didn't present any of the negative side. I have to wonder if the villagers were given a choice of faster internet, where 5% of them had their bank account cleaned out, and 5% had their identity stolen, or slower, secure internet which they would choose?
If you’re in $TinyVillage in $PoorAfricanCountry, do you even have a bank account or an online identity that could be stolen? Just my $0.02 on this increasingly off-topic thread. ---- Andy Ringsmuth andy@newslink.com News Link – Manager Technology, Travel & Facilities 2201 Winthrop Rd., Lincoln, NE 68502-4158 (402) 475-6397 (402) 304-0083 cellular