Hi Jeff As our priority, we will do MPLS VPN, IPv6, Flowspec firstly. In the future, we will consider multicast and EVPN. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com] Sent: 2015年8月7日 14:06 To: Peng Xiao (penxiao) Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation Hi Peng, Good stuff! Any plans for multicast, RTC and EVPN AF's? Regards, Jeff
On Aug 6, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Peng Xiao (penxiao) <penxiao@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
Ipv6 and other address families are under development. We have already designed the data structures for them as you can see from the documentation, but it's just some testing code and not stable and we are not doing them after careful consideration. But at last, they will come out.
-----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu] Sent: 2015年8月7日 0:16 To: Peng Xiao (penxiao) Cc: Jahangir Hossain; xxnog@ledeuns.net; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:25:55 -0000, "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" said:
Currently, yabgp does not support IPv6 address family. We only support IPv4 now.
http://tnx.nl/legacy-ip-only.svg
Seriously guys. It's 2015. We really don't care what you hack for your own use - but publicly announcing stuff that doesn't have IPv6 support is getting kind of embarassing...
*especially* when it's a major vendor open-sourcing their code. (I'm still willing to cut a *little* slack for "two guys and a stack of empty pizza boxes" software....)