I seriously doubt many TOR exit nodes have the political clout to be considered a common carrier. In a related note, I wonder if the six-strike rule would violate the ISP's safe harbor, as it's clearly content inspection. Nick On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jordan Michaels <jordan@viviotech.net>wrote:
On 12/03/2012 03:31 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 08:49:24AM +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
Can you imagine an email thread that lasted longer than an entire weekend?
Yes, I can. I've participated in some that went on for months. It's simply a matter of effectiveness and attention span.
This email needs to be murdered, because it is completely out of control.
I disagree, strongly, as this is an issue of unfortunate timely relevance to the community.
+1 I strongly disagree as well. I am very interested to see how this case evolves in and out of court. Are Tor exit-node operators going to be given the same rights as ISP's who's networks are used for illegal purposes? I would hope so, but it doesn't seem like that has happened in this case, so I am very interested to hear how the situation pans out.
It is extremely relevant to the Internet community and to free speech in general.
Kind regards, Jordan Michaels Vivio Technologies