On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Darrin Walton wrote:
Do you honestly think, a company like Exodus would only have one path to 701? Regardless of who said Exodus did, why would you not believe it?
Did I say I didn't believe it? I said I didn't realize he worked for exodus. Had I known that, I wouldn't have suggested that if he filters _701_ from his other connections, he would lose 701 connectivity in the event that his 701 connection went down.
|+ As for paths into 701, we three. All of them > DS3.
Quite funny, why do I not see 13944 behind 701? (I mean, I could go 701 -> 6347 -> 13944, or 6259 -> 13944, but not 701 -> 13944). Is something wrong on your side?
There is nothing wrong on my side. We're not a direct peer of 701. I never said I did. I do have paths into 701 however. You didn't specify direct 701_13944.
|+ Have a nice day Darrin.
having a great day, how about yourself?
-- darrin walton, darrinw@nixc.net
--- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc