8 Oct
2007
8 Oct
'07
9:21 p.m.
On 10/8/07, Keegan.Holley@sungard.com <Keegan.Holley@sungard.com> wrote:
Wouldn't resources still be an issue. Since the address space is so much larger wouldn't the 235k v6 routes take up more than 4 times the router memory?
Keegan, According to Cisco's product feature pages IPv6 routes take up twice as much space in the TCAM as IPv4 routes. Make of that what you will. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004