On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
Sabri Berisha wrote:
Dear Peter,
Peter Dambier did post nonsense. In fact, it was total nonsense since the AMS-IX is not present in any KPN datacentre, *and* it is impossible for end-hosts to connect to the AMS-IX directly.
Part of the traceroutes between me and the system I was talking of:
6 da-ea1.DA.DE.net.DTAG.DE (62.153.179.54) 18.334 ms 22.725 ms 4 ams-e4.AMS.NL.net.DTAG.DE (62.154.15.2) 145.264 ms 152.212 ms 5 amx-gw2.nl.dtag.de (195.69.145.211) 14.737 ms 13.115 ms 11.501 ms 5 gb-2-0-0.amsix1.tcams.nl.easynet.net (195.69.144.38) 169.072 ms
I did not say the host was connected to the IX. I said it was living in a datacentre connected to Amsterdam IX.
You said:
I know of one host here in germany who can see h.root-servers.net. That host is living in a KPN data centre directly connected to Amterdam IX.
Your own traceroute clearly shows that your host is not directly connected to the AMS-IX. Nor does the KPN datacenter it resides in. The AMS-IX has 4 datacenters where members can place equipment which can be directly connected to the AMS-IX: - GlobalSwitch; - Sara; - Nikhef; - Telecity2, Kuiperbergerweg; Every statement otherwise is bogus, nonsense, crap or whatever term you prefer to use for this. -- Sabri please do not throw salami pizza away