On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
- If you are already using IPoE, tell more why should I upgrade?
The IPoE and IPoEoADSL I have done didn't need radius, didn't need BNG, didn't need a lot of the complications you're talking about. It could basically be realised in any decent L3 switch as default gateway for the customers instead of needing BNG.
So I'd say if you want to get full potential of IPoE you need to do simplification as well, otherwise there is little use in doing the work if he only thing you want to change is from IPoPPPoE to IPoE encapsulation and keep all the other stuff you're doing.
IPoPPPoE requires special CPE and router at your end to achieve high speeds, because they need to support encapsulation/decapsulation of packets at whatever speed you provide. The number of devices that do this is a lot smaller than the ones that do decent speeds with just IPoE.
So some people will say migrating to IPoE from IPoPPPoE buys them nothing, because they feel they need all the mechanisms they currently use. Greenfield deployments might say "hey, we can do this without a lot of the needed mechanisms for IPoPPPoE" and save a lot of money and complication.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
Thanks for your reply. I'm would like this simplicity if I could keep same functionalities I have in PPPoE. By functionalities I mean: - AAA - Triple-ply services and classified accounting per service - Possibility to suspend a user service in case of over-quota - applying fair-share policies Do I have any option to have simplicity and same functionality together? Regards, Nasser