Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

----- Original Message -----

On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:

so there really is no drawback from getting the /44, and having enough space to not have to worry about it in the future.

It's only a worry if you can only route /48s, which was my question. And seriously, we're going to be banging around in the emptiness as compared to our IPv4 allocations. :)

You can route /48 or shorter (larger) How many sites do you have? If less than 192, /44 is perfect, unless some of those sites require more than a /48. Then, it gets more complicated :-) -Randy