On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:38 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <201002230227.o1N2RaDp021692@mail.r-bonomi.com>, Robert Bonomi write s:
Quick! Somebody propose a snail-mail portability bill. When a renter changes to a different landlord, his snail-mail address will be optionally his to take along, "just like" what is proposed for ISP clients.
You can pay for this redirection service if you want it. Usually it is time limited and often not fully implemented.
But.... with snail-mail it usually ¬just works¬, uses existing proven technology, provides a little extra revenue for the carriers, etc etc etc I just don't see any of the above happening with _this_ proposal. Hmm, maybe 'proposal' isn't the correct word for it - by a long way. I have a feeling it's going to be implemented in the following manner: ./great_idea.sh | bad_plan >> /dev/null Hey - maybe they should submit an RFC? :) next up: State of Israel vs. SORBS et al. ding-ding! Maybe I'm too pessimistic? Gord