23 Jul
2010
23 Jul
'10
2:53 a.m.
As long as customers believe that having a NAT router/"firewall" in place is a security feature, I don't think anyone is going to get rid of the NAT box. In all reality, NAT boxes do work for 99% of customers out there. Bora On 7/22/10 7:34 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> wrote: Well, wouldn't it be better if the provider simply issued enough space to make NAT66 unnecessary? Owen