Our mailer tries to deliver mail to 131.119.250.119 (bargate.silvaco.com, SILVACO.BARRNET.NET) and gets host unreachable. Routes for 131.119.0.0 are given as: gw3#sh ip ro 131.119.0.0 Routing entry for 131.119.0.0 (mask 255.255.255.0), 2 known subnets Redistributing via igrp 51771 B 131.119.246.0 [200/100] via 193.23.5.33, 16:10:55 B 131.119.253.0 [200/100] via 193.23.5.33, 16:11:51 gw3#sh ip bgp 131.119.246.0 BGP routing table entry for 131.119.246.0/255.255.255.0, version 2409868 Paths: (1 available, best #1) 1273 1755 1800 1239 1280 200 193.23.5.33 (metric 108166) from 192.54.104.130, localpref 100, weight 210 Origin IGP, valid, internal, best gw3#sh ip bgp 131.119.253.0 BGP routing table entry for 131.119.253.0/255.255.255.0, version 2409849 Paths: (1 available, best #1) 1273 1755 1800 1239 1280 200 193.23.5.33 (metric 108166) from 192.54.104.130, localpref 100, weight 210 Origin IGP, valid, internal, best Is it useful to add Class-B-Subnets to the routing table whilst we are trying to reduce Class-C entries? Regards, Arnold -- XLINK Hostmaster of the day / NTG Netzwerk und Telematic GmbH \/ phone: +49 721 9652 0 Geschaeftsbereich XLINK /\ LINK fax: +49 721 9652 210 Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 3 /_______ email: hostmaster@xlink.net D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany