10 Feb
2010
10 Feb
'10
8:55 a.m.
On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jake Khuon wrote:
Excellent production.
... but still an advertisement for use of IXPs instead of private peering or alike. I'd say it contains several factual errors or at least omittance of important factors (settlement free peering in other ways than IXPs, for instance, is hardly mentioned).
Could you point to a single factual error please? That is a serious charge to just throw out without a single word to back up your claim. And no, "omittance of important factors" is not a "factual error" in a 5 minute video of a wide and amazingly complex topic. Put another way: If you think you can do better, then let's see your video. -- TTFN, patrick