I'd be down with that. Gamers will kill for even 1 nanosecond of lower "ping" :-).
Which has long made me chuckle. It's analogous to the golfers buying things to "fix your slice!" or "get 10 more yards!" , when the true reason those things happen is completely your swing. :) On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 9:19 AM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.com> wrote:
On 26/Jun/20 19:40, Sabri Berisha wrote:
Don't hold your breath. It's most likely not related to the capabilities of the hardware, or even the kernel running on the platform.
I'm hoping a new device will bring with it renewed vigour :-).
I'm probably being ambitious. Overly.
My guess is that there is no IPv6 support because the backend doesn't support it. I've seen this at previous employers where the network was ready for IPv6, but back-end applications were lagging. And that might require development on a lot of games as well.
Perhaps we should start a rumor: "IPv6 has a lower ping!". We'll get thousands of gamers protesting for v6 in front of Sony's HQ :)
I'd be down with that. Gamers will kill for even 1 nanosecond of lower "ping" :-).
Which is quite at odds with a flats screen TV I bought from Sony back in 2015 that supported IPv6 - and this was Sony's own OS, not a 3rd party one some of their current units ship with. The good ol' silo problem, perhaps...
Mark.