8 Apr
2005
8 Apr
'05
11:05 p.m.
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Niek wrote:
On 4/9/2005 3:46 AM +0100, Nathan Ward wrote:
- I was forced to use DJBs naming conventions for zones If you administer 2-3 domains, sure it's an hassle, if not, put code-monkeys to work. Most script people I know love the tinydns zone structure in comparison to bind's one.
because instead of MX you have . or + or - or : or something so helpfully meaningful... same for NS and A and CNAME... Yes, 1 more level of indirection is not always a good thing. -chris (not that I dislike djbdns, i just don't understand why things have to be 'different' so very much... and if bind works, why use djbdns?)