Re: MPLS VPNs or not?

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Christian Kuhtz wrote:

I think it's pretty well known that the point you mention is FUD. Besides, it's not really intended to be 'multiple tables' with multiple instances of routing processes.. it's an indexed table run by the same routing process.

Logic says that not seeing the routes at all, a la layer-2 tunnels, is going to scale *better* then having your routers deal with them at all. Less routes/resources=greater scalability. andy