Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language
But please don't forget that in this particular DDoS event there was no IP spoofing. So anti-spoofing precautions, either on administrative or technical level, would be useless in this case. And this case is not so untypical. my .002$ Przemek -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Paul Vixie Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:44 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes) Following up on my own post: vixie@mfnx.net (Paul Vixie) writes: like:
...
Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc) and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at this stage of the game. This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read NANOG. This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.