admins, can we can this worm can back and .. get back to work ?
kthxbi.

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:29 PM Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
>
> LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed.
> ________________________________
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>
> I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.
>
>
>
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com@nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
> To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>
>
> Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:
>
>
>
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html
>
>
>
> Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.
>
>
>
> Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:
>
>
>
> https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
>
>
>
> Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?