Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz@sctcweb.com>:
As is, one thing that grates a bit personally is that the two advisor pages do not share a common structure - If I'm doing a comparison, even unconsciously, I'm going to want to be looking at like objects. Instead, I have your page, which matches the rest of the formatting of the Loadsharer's website, and then I go to Dave Täht's page which is a Patreon blog post, with a very different appearance.
I suggest that you provide Advisors with Loadsharer pages like your own, to increase the commonality between list appearances.
My background is military - some uniformity counts in my worldview. Maybe the lack of it will assist in splitting the loadsharers between Advisors, which could be considered a feature.
No, I think you are right and had already identified this as a problem. I just hadn't gotten around to nudging Dave about it yet. I'm forwarding this to him. I'm going to take your feedback as actionable advice that I need to do something formal about making adviser pages comparable *now*, rather than when I get a round tuit. What I can do about this within the Loadsharers organizational design is put up a "Best practices for Advisers" page strongly recommending that new advisers should clone an existing Adviser page when creating theirs. I'll put that up today. I can also offer advisers the ability to host their pages through the Gitlab repository I use for the main loadsharers page and FAQ, with the same toolchain for making the HTML. Which is, in case anyone didn't recognize it, asciidoc. With a Gitlab CI job rendering to GitLab pages and a custom domain. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>