In message <01de01d13900$fe364dd0$faa2e970$@gmail.com>, "Chuck Church" writes:
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Petach Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 1:59 PM Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Nat
I'm still waiting for the IETF to come around to allowing feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6 when it comes to DHCP.
And that recent thread on prefix delegation doesn't really leave a good taste in one's mouth about how to delegate a /56 or a /48 to a CPE, and get that/those prefix(s) in your (ISP) routing tables. Given that 99.999% of home users would be fine with a delegation of a single /64 and a single subnet I'm tempted to do that for now and let the DHCP-PD ink dry for a while so CPE support can follow up.
I have a single CPE router and 3 /64's in use. One for each of the wireless SSID's and one for the wired network. This is the default for homenet devices. A single /64 means you have to bridge all the traffic. A single /64 has never been enough and it is time to grind that myth into the ground. ISP's that say a single /64 is enough are clueless. Mark
Chuck
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org