Thanks for all the answers! I think I have one more detail I'd like to know. Lets say you own X/22. You have delegated X/23 to your customer, keeping the other /23 for yourself. For some reason, your customer also owns and announced (to you) all remaining IPs necessary to complete X/21. Do you announce the aggregate X/21 (including addresses not associated with you), the aggregate X/22 (only address belonging to you), or the more specific route X/23 (including only addresses delegated from you to your customer)? Best regards, Lars On 14.04.20 06:07, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Don't user as-sets step one. Rpki does not understand how to express an as-sets' authorization.
Why do you want to do this?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 13:34 Lars Prehn <lprehn@mpi-inf.mpg.de <mailto:lprehn@mpi-inf.mpg.de>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
how exactly do you aggregate routes? When do you add the AS_SET attribute, when do you omit it? How does the latter interplay with RPKI?
Best regards,
Lars