There still is no clarification on the requirement of an official PE stamp. My personal feeling is that if it's not decided by now, the week after filing opens, it would be an unreasonable burden for filers. I believe it's more "professional engineer" like a CPNI for CBRS. On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 11:44 AM KCI Dave Logan via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
Hi all. We operate a small regional ISP in Colorado, but no size is too small to ignore the FCC, as you all know.
We're really struggling to find the required engineer for the filing, and we're small enough that we don't have an officer with engineering credentials.
Any pointers in the CO/WY/NE/KS area would be great, on or off list.
I sure hope we're the only org with this problem still, and all the rest of you are good to go.
Thanks, dave
--
Dave Logan Kentec Communications, Inc. 970-522-8107