What about 7600-S models ? I think Cisco is claiming that Cisco 7600-S (7606S, etc...) chassis is ready for less than 50 ms switching time with right software. For routing, you can setup graceful restart or something like that. For Cisco ASR9000, I couldn't say much, because it is new product. When I checked Cisco product lines around January 2009, it wasn't there. So I consider it as still beta test product at customer's expense. :-) Alex Nick Colton wrote:
I work for a small CLEC, we have been doing FTTP for 5 years now but are getting ready to update our core network and introduce IPTV services. Cisco has been recommending the Cisco 7600 as our core router. My concern is that cisco told us that in the event of an RSP failover the 7600 could take up to 30 seconds to begin routing packets again, this seems wrong to me since my old Extreme Networks BD 6808 can do failovers and rebuild route tables in under 5 seconds but?? More recently I have been reading up on the ASR 9000 however and it appears that it would be better sized for our company than the 7600. A few questions I have for the group. 1. Has anyone used the ASR 9000 in place of a Cisco 7600?
2. Is the ASR 9000 Carrier ready? Meaning 5x9's of availability, few component failures, solid software...etc
3. Has anyone had issues where it took the 7600 30 seconds to start routing again after an RSP failover?
Thanks,
Nick