24 Mar
2014
24 Mar
'14
7:27 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
And all those IPv4 addresses for the 1:1 translation required by the stateless version are coming from where exactly?
maybe you should read the documents
I did. They were abstruse beyond even the normal level for RFCs but I made it through. You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN. The question stands: where are you planning to get the extra IPv4 addresses for the static 1:1 mapping? -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004