20 Nov
2021
20 Nov
'21
4:38 p.m.
On Nov 19, 2021, at 12:11 , Jim <mysidia@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:24 PM David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
...
Some (not me) might argue it could (further) hamper IPv6 deployment by diverting limited resources.
It may help IPv6 deployment if more V4 addresses are eventually released and allocated Assuming the RIRs would ultimately like to provision the usage of addresses within their own policies that the new address releases are exclusively for 'IPv6 Transition Tech.', such as CGN NAT addresses,
CGN NAT is NOT a transition technology. DS-LITE is an example of a transition technology CGN-NAT is an example of an avoidance of transition technology. Owen