Wow...  Talk about a topic that will start a hornet's nest between engineers and management every time if "money were no object".  It's sort of like airlines asking "what should be the seat width of our cabins?"  You're gonna get some heated responses.

Just jumping into this thread after scanning over the general sentiments, I see people who are alphageeks and those who look at everything pragmatically.  Neither is wrong, but I agree with some that it's the wrong question to be asking.  I've seen customer sentiment in general with cable ISP's that the upstream is too limiting in this day and age of Twitch/TikTok streams and heavy media users.  Gotta remember that for the most part, almost all the internet traffic is TCP and thus has that two-way charge when it comes to consuming data... the more data you receive, the faster you need to ACK those packets and if you're upstream is limited, you won't be delivering a quality product.  

But more to the point, this is the time where a business could take advantage of the opportunities being offered in resource capital to upgrade their entire physical plant.  The minimum should be the best technology you can offer for your subscriber base.  If you see your subscriber base planning on utilizing 5G, then you'll need to consider throwing out the old and upgrading the last mile.  That will be some cost and effort.  But last I heard: glass fiber is fairly future-proof.

Wireless is great for addressing some of the legacy "last mile" issues - but unless you're next to the device, you'll be fighting for sufficient bandwidth - as we see with 2.4Ghz 802.11 networks simply due to physics (ie: more bandwidth == less rf range).  And since wireless is a shared resource in and of itself, it's not the solution by itself.

We shouldn't be blocking any improvement in any part of the network.  IPv6 and 5G could truly be an amazing thing and next-level products could be brought to market - if the network was there.  We've seen many times that if the bandwidth is available ( and hence the inception of 'Internet2' which is proving beneficial for all sorts of science research due to the size of datasets ) there will be applications - even if it's to allow people to truly be without "boundaries" or freed from working in a specific location due to physical presence requirements and are able to work anywhere if bandwidth is available to accommodate and not be impacting.

This is usually the biggest consideration for every teleworker unless the location provides other value (ie: production or lifestyle benefits).

You may only use enough home internet to stick to the lowest subscriber package.  In an urban modern family, that would be the exception case.. not the normal.

I get reluctance, but with Starlink and Amazon going up to orbit with satellite constellations, Alphabet and FB doing drone/UAV research, etc... the reason they're doing those projects and paying for the research of "how @ scale to do x", because the physical plant network providers like former Bell and Cable have a track record of not showing the willingness to extend service out to that .09% of consumers within a region because the customer lives at the end of a 50-mile dirt road and there are no other subscribers along the way. 

The fact that ADSL hasn't locked up this percentage of people is shameful on a multitude of levels - and that's not even withstanding the security reality of the next problem: SCADA and security were to manage the jack pump at oil wells, you need to use a dialup modem just to flick a switch on or off... let alone the other problems with running a national infrastructure over the PSTN.

So the correct answer is a different question:  Which fiber technology will we use to deliver FTTP/FTTH?   

From discussions I monitor in WISP/FISP space, the companies/isp's that commit to building that future growth, are either causing subscriber growth or are being called by real estate developers to drop fiber in new communities because customers are demanding fast internet with their freshly new homes.  For older locations, it should be a no-brainer and especially to the farm where agra-biz impacts logistics and systems - like tractors.