Dear Keegan, Thank you for your advice! Here is the output of my configuration and applied debug commands: # PE router config: The session bellow is between PE and CE: router bgp 34224 ! address-family ipv4 vrf DEF redistribute connected redistribute static neighbor 10.18.7.1 remote-as 34224 neighbor 10.18.7.1 description to_echo-sdc_CE neighbor 10.18.7.1 activate neighbor 10.18.7.1 send-community both neighbor 10.18.7.1 prefix-list Permit_Default in neighbor 10.18.7.1 route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF in neighbor 10.18.7.1 route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF out no synchronization exit-address-family end Hotel-st_PE#show route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: Set clauses: ip next-hop peer-address Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes Hotel-st_PE#show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf DEF summary Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.18.7.1 4 34224 85 38 894079 0 0 00:00:02 1 Hotel-st_PE#show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf DEF neighbors 10.18.7.1 routes Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path Route Distinguisher: 34224:151 (default for vrf DEF) *>i0.0.0.0 10.18.7.1 0 120 0 i Hotel-st_PE#show ip route vrf DEF 23.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets S 23.23.23.23 [1/0] via 10.18.7.1 24.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 24.24.24.24 is directly connected, Loopback30 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks B 10.100.187.1/32 [200/0] via 10.1.7.253, 00:16:16 C 10.18.7.0/29 is directly connected, Vlan187 B* 0.0.0.0/0 [200/0] via 10.18.7.1, 00:08:40 #### Bravo-plv is other test PE router which should receive and use "default route" bravo-plv_PE#show ip route vrf DEF 23.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 23.23.23.23 [200/0] via 10.1.1.253, 1w5d 24.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 24.24.24.24 [200/0] via 10.1.1.253, 2w0d 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 10.100.187.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback100 B 10.18.7.0/29 [200/0] via 10.1.1.253, 1w6d B* 0.0.0.0/0 [200/0] via 10.18.7.1, 00:02:37 ### this ping is OK because 10.18.7.0/29 is connected on the PE router. bravo-plv_PE#ping vrf DEF 10.18.7.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.18.7.1, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms ### 212.73.140.140.190 isn't in routing table. It is direct connected network on interface on CE and passing via "default route" bravo-plv_PE#ping vrf DEF 212.73.140.190 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 212.73.140.190, timeout is 2 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) This is very strange: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ## this output showing that the router not set MPLS label for 0.0.0.0/0 Only for static and the connected networks. bravo-plv_PE#show ip cef vrf DEF 10.18.7.0/29 10.18.7.0/29 nexthop 10.1.7.1 Vlan15 label 76 43 bravo-plv_PE#show ip cef vrf DEF 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 recursive via 87.121.83.25 unusable: no label ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Best~ -- --- *Javor Kliachev* IP engineer Neterra Ltd. Telephone: +359 2 975 16 16 Fax: +359 2 975 34 36 Mobile: +359 885 988 495 www.neterra.net <http://www.neterra.net>