11 Sep
2012
11 Sep
'12
6:15 p.m.
(2012/09/11 20:52), valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:51:53 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
Anything written in RFC1796 should be ignored, because RFC1796, an informational, not standard track, RFC, states so.
On the other hand, if you're relying on the fact that 1796 is informational
No, I don't. It's Jimmy, Eliot and you who are relying on a non standard track RFC to deny RFC3102 and all the non standard track RFCs, which is the silly paradox.
Standard or not, we have Christian Huitema, John Postel, and Steve Crocker
If you have some respect to them, don't involve them with your silly paradox. Masataka Ohta