26 Sep
2000
26 Sep
'00
12:58 p.m.
From: Troy Davis [mailto:troy@nack.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:49 AM
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer <rmeyer@MHSC.com> wrote:
I know that all of you are aware of this. Granted, each subsequently smaller subnet also limits the maximum number of hosts that will respond to the smurf trigger. The point is that, the web-site ONLY tests 0 and
Actually, that's often not the case. Through NAT and other modern marvels, it's possible to have massively overpopulated netblocks that all respond. The largest amplifier we've found yet was 170,000x (on a class C).
Thank you Troy, However my point remains.