On (2014-03-23 20:09 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
I expect this to change little in the enterprise space. I think use of ULA and NAT66 will be one of the things enterprises will push for, because how can a printer have a public IPv6 address that is reachable directly from the Internet, despite the fact that there is a properly configured firewall at the perimetre offering half-decent protection?
Or IT isn't buying the 'renumbering is easy' argument, for any non-trivial size company even figuring how where exactly can be IP addresses punched out statically would be expensive and long process. If you are pushing for customer to use your PA in their LAN, I'm guessing net-result is you should never reclaim those addresses after customer leaves, since chances are, some customers won't renumber, but will 1:1 NAT your PA to new operator PA, and your next customer with this block will complain about reachability problems to this other customer. But at least we can hope it'll be 1:1 NAT + ULA, which I would suggest to my enterprise customers who won't want to get PI or become LIR. -- ++ytti