6 Feb
2020
6 Feb
'20
7:30 p.m.
In message <24124.30737.599536.809689@gargle.gargle.HOWL>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I suggested.
For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a number like that) being abused.
Do we have that number?
I suggested that nobody has that number, to any degree of accuracy, as of today. Once again, this is something that I would be happy to be proven wrong about. Regards, rfg