1 Nov
2005
1 Nov
'05
11:16 a.m.
Pete Templin wrote:
John Curran wrote:
Cold-potato only addresses the long-haul; there's still cost on the receiving network even if its handed off at the closest interconnect to the final destination(s).
And there's still revenue, as the traffic is going to customers (we all filter our prefixes carefully, right?). What's the problem with cold-potato again, or should we all just try to double-dip?
pt
ah yes, double dipping. On-net traffic should be charged a lot less, because after all, it is double dipping. /vijay