You’re probably right that there a lot more in service devices that are running OSPF. But IS-IS assuredly is involved in routing way more traffic volume. 

In the end , right tool for the job is all that matters. 


On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:17 Steven Bahnsen <sbahnsen20@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

First time poster looking for some input on a debate and I apologise if I've
done this completely wrong, but I don't think my colleague will be convinced
until he hears it from this community.

Granted I'm relatively green when it comes to networking, but it was my
understand that other than BGP, the most widely used/implemented IGP  would be
OSPF. However, my colleague insists that I'm 100 percent wrong and that is
IS-IS.

I want to be clear, I'm not debating which protocol is better or worse, as they
both have their strengths and weaknesses and ultimately it comes down to several
factors based on a particular use-case on which routing protocol is the best way
forward for a network.

However in saying that, I believe that, when it comes to sheer numbers of where
an IGP is implemented, OSPF is far more widely used in the world today, whether
it be in small to medium to large businesses, Enterprise networks and even
Service Provider networks (where as per my understanding, is where IS-IS really
shines)

I understand that this isn't really quantifiable, but I would like to get the
opinions/experiences from this list and see what the outcome of this question is
out of sheer curiosity.

Thanks!

Steve