It took me a while to parse your message. But I finally got it. It's <sarcasm> wow! I am not making a political statement about any war/non-war. Regardless of motives, this clown is propogating DoS against someone and it doesn't matter who, or why. He is every bit as scummy as any phrack member. At 12:37 PM 11/19/98 -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
We can send PMS after them. Oh, I guess I should elaborate.
PMS = Pissed-off Marine Snipers.
Nothing will ruin your day like being denied the squeeze when you have high confidence on a certain head-of-state over in camel-land.
At 11:17 PM 11/18/98 -0800, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
At 09:37 PM 11/18/98 -0500, Robert Boyle wrote:
This was forwarded to me by a friend. I was interested in exactly what they meant. This is pretty bad. I think these people don't understand that this affects US more than it affects the people who they are targeting. I suppose this is a strong case for transparent caching. Any thoughts?
Yeah, they need to be nuked for propogating DoS attacks. This kind of stuff is definitely against AUP and TOS around here. Has someone contacted their provider? I would in a heartbeat, but whois isn't working at the moment.
http://www.thing.net/~rdom/zapsPublic/ddkfoyer.htm and following the
___________________________________________________ Roeland M.J. Meyer, ISOC (InterNIC RM993) e-mail: <mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com>rmeyer@mhsc.com Internet phone: hawk.mhsc.com Personal web pages: <http://www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer>www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer Company web-site: <http://www.mhsc.com/>www.mhsc.com/ ___________________________________________ Who is John Galt? "Atlas Shrugged" - Ayn Rand