bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: [..]
there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published, and then the prefix was not properly reclaimed... and so was reused for something else. Interresting that you say that. Still using 3ffe::/24 and ip6.int I guess? :) You clearly thought you needed to keep your 'customers' connected on the 6bone using that block of space.
you guess wrong.
Not a guess, it is what you wrote, long live archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg00270.html has: 8<----------------------------- bmanning wrote: [..] Sure... there are only a few left. Got rid of two a couple weeks back. That said.... I will announce the prefix as long as people are using it. (whine away) [..] ----------------------------->8 Other references you probably still have unread in your mailbox. Greets, Jeroen