5 May
2008
5 May
'08
2:19 p.m.
On May 6, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
If not, what should the criteria be for an "official" note of the paper?
Perhaps it's an oversimplification, but can't those who wish to publish such information simply deliver their papers at a NANOG meeting (after acceptance by the Program Committee, which acts as a gate), and then the NANOG folks post the documents along with any slides and the VoDs of their presentations, in the usual fashion? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> // +66.83.266.6344 mobile History is a great teacher, but it also lies with impunity. -- John Robb