On 22 May 2018 at 09:14, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
I'm more curious about use-cases for folk considering SR, than SR itself.
4 years on, and I still can't find a reason to replace my LDP network with SR.
Your use-case makes sense, as it sounds like Cisco deliberately left LDP out of your box, considering SR is in. But that's a whole other discussion :-)...
I'm also interested in the uses cases. As a "typical" service provider (whatever that means) who doesn't have any SR specific requirements such as service chaining, the only reason/feature SR has which currently makes me want to deploy it is TI-FLA (to improve our (r)LFA coverage) - but this is only for failure scenarios so under normal working conditions as far as I know, there is no benefit available to us right now. Cheers, James.